A Practical Guide to SPC Control Charts for the ASQ CQE
Control charts are the heart of statistical process control and a major CQE exam topic. Here is how to choose the right chart and read it correctly.
Statistical process control (SPC) is where quality engineering earns its name, and the control chart is its central tool. If you can read a control chart correctly and choose the right one for the data in front of you, you have mastered one of the most heavily weighted areas of the CQE Body of Knowledge.
I am John Lee of Alpha Training and Consulting. This guide covers what control charts do, how to pick the right chart, and the rules for spotting an out-of-control process—the exact reasoning the CQE exam rewards.
What a control chart actually does
Every process varies. The genius of the control chart, developed by Walter Shewhart, is that it distinguishes two kinds of variation. Common-cause variation is the natural, random noise inherent in a stable process. Special-cause (assignable) variation is a signal that something changed—a new material lot, a tool wearing out, an operator error. The control chart tells you which one you are looking at so you do not overreact to noise or ignore a real signal.
Choosing the right chart
The first decision is whether your data is variables (measured) or attributes (counted).
| Data type | Chart | Use when |
|---|---|---|
| Variables | X-bar and R | Subgroups of measured data, small subgroup size |
| Variables | X-bar and s | Subgroups with larger sample sizes |
| Variables | I-MR (individuals) | One measurement at a time, no subgroups |
| Attributes | p / np | Proportion or number of defective units |
| Attributes | c / u | Number of defects per unit or per area of opportunity |
Control limits vs. specification limits
This distinction trips up many candidates. Control limits are calculated from the process data—typically the mean plus or minus three standard deviations of the plotted statistic. They describe the voice of the process. Specification limits come from the customer or design engineer—they describe the voice of the customer. Never place specification limits on a control chart; they answer a different question, which capability analysis addresses.
Reading out-of-control signals
A point outside the control limits is the most obvious signal, but it is not the only one. The Western Electric and Nelson rules define non-random patterns that also indicate special causes:
- A single point beyond three sigma.
- Two of three consecutive points beyond two sigma on the same side.
- Four of five consecutive points beyond one sigma on the same side.
- Eight or more consecutive points on one side of the center line (a run).
- Six points in a row steadily increasing or decreasing (a trend).
When a chart signals a special cause, the response is to investigate and eliminate the assignable cause—not to adjust the process blindly. Once only common-cause variation remains, the process is in statistical control and you can meaningfully assess whether it is capable of meeting specifications. That next step, process capability, is covered in its own guide.
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between control limits and specification limits?+
Control limits come from the process data and describe what the process actually does. Specification limits come from the customer or design and describe what the process is required to do. They are independent—a process can be in control yet still fail to meet specifications.
How do I choose between a variables chart and an attributes chart?+
If you are measuring a continuous quantity (length, weight, temperature), use a variables chart such as X-bar and R. If you are counting defective units or defects, use an attributes chart such as p, np, c, or u.
What does it mean when a process is in statistical control?+
It means only common-cause variation is present—the process is stable and predictable. It does not necessarily mean the process meets specifications; that is a separate question answered by capability analysis.

Written by
John Lee
President, Alpha Training and Consulting
John Lee has more than 25 years of experience in quality engineering and has personally earned every ASQ certification, including the Certified Quality Engineer (CQE). A Shingo Award–winning author, he has helped thousands of engineers pass their ASQ exams on the first attempt with a 94% first-time pass rate.
Certifications: BSME, MBA, CMQ/OE, CQE, CRE, CQA, CQIA, CQI, CCT, CQPA, CQT, CHA, CBA, CSQE, CSQP, CCQM, CSSYB, CSSGB, CSSBB, CPGP, CMBB
Alpha Training and Consulting is an independent training provider and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by ASQ. "ASQ" and "Certified Quality Engineer (CQE)" are trademarks of the American Society for Quality. Exam policies, fees, and Body of Knowledge weightings are set by ASQ and can change—always confirm current details at asq.org.